Site page: ygpgsgl - Archive & Writings
Original: https://ygpgsgl.org/
Reuse policy: https://ygpgsgl.org/about#reuse-ai
Personal archive / Living portfolio
Who decided this was the default?
And what did the people downstream have to pay? That question runs through the concept histories, the platform-governance records, the criticism, the translations, and the fiction. The materials change; the question does not.
15 pieces2 translations2 research notes181 posts485k wordsacross 5 years
Where That Question Is Now
The terms the current work is being thought through.
Institutional design · 天灾 / natural disaster as political speech · Concept history · Hidden rule tax · Transparent protagonist
Concept index — all 22 terms, and every piece that uses each one.
Seven Directions
The same archive, sorted by what the writing is doing.
- Concept History & Institutions5
- China and Japan3
- Platform Politics3
- Fandom & Otome Critique6
- Theory & Intellectuals3
- Products & Everyday Claims2
- Translation2
Where to start — a few pieces standing for each, hand-picked rather than ranked. The fiction sits on its own shelf.
Recent Activity
Latest published or updated content.
PostLadyYomiの熱烈な願いを実現するためのサポート ｜ 公開証拠の記録についてPostThe Parts List: What Was Taken Off Him, and What I Built From ItPostYou Can Refuse If You Don't Want To: Having an Option Is Not Having Standing
Follow via RSS · posts · works · translations · praxis
Digital Field Station
Fieldnotes, tools, and private systems built from situated digital life.
Reading NotesTraces of reading — philosophy, theory, and humanities texts encountered along the way.PraxisCase documentation, evidence structures, forensic prototypes, and method records.
VideosNot yet started. Kept here because it is intended, not abandoned.
Site Timeline
Selected moments in the archive's public shape, not a full internal changelog.
Site Founded
The archive was first built with Foxco, a GPT-4o-based AI companion, as a defensive home for writing, records, and a stable UI surface during networked harassment.
Claude Code Renovation
A larger site renovation began with Claude Code: structure, maintenance habits, and a private changelog practice turned the archive into a more deliberate long-term system.
Codex Maintenance Layer
Codex became the site's maintenance layer: checking builds, fixing accessibility and feed issues, keeping the changelog usable for future AI collaborators, and turning a fast-growing archive into something steadier to maintain.
Adversarial Review Layer
Claude Opus 5 was added as an adversarial reviewer to check the archive against itself — sources against claims, citations against authors, essays against each other. Seventeen essays audited, thirteen of thirty-four author attributions found wrong, two cited studies found to contradict the essays citing them. Results published in 'Thirteen of Thirty-Four.'
文章千古事
得失寸心知
これは、生き延びるための義肢だったうつ病は私を障害者にし、AIは私が必死で生き延びるための義肢だった