🎤 Fake Interview: “I’m Not a Hypocrite, I’m Just Me”
August 14, 2025
Reporter: Ladyyomi, do you think “mistaking someone’s identity” is wrong? Ladyyomi: Wrong? I can mistake you for someone else — or pretend to — and then tell everyone you = another person. Reporter: And the other person can’t object? Ladyyomi: Of course not! If you talk back, if you keep bringing it up, you’re harassing me! You’re stalking me! You’re DARVO!
Reporter: But you say you hate hatred and stalking the most. Ladyyomi: Exactly! That’s why I’ll write a ten-thousand-word Google Doc cursing her, rant non-stop about her on Tumblr, DeviantArt, and Cara, and even report her brand-new Bluesky account.
Reporter: Why report her Bluesky account? Did she say anything insulting? Any personal attacks? Ladyyomi: No, but I just don’t like her. She keeps talking on Bluesky about things I’ve done — and that’s exactly why I want to destroy her. I have severe autism and I don’t want to see these things, but she keeps ignoring my wishes, bypassing my blocks, and shouting at me from afar to get my attention — oh, she really is a pathetic little worm, jealous of my talent and popularity. Worst of all, she dares to curse my LGBT OCs, what a homophobic bastard.
Reporter: … Audience: [chuckles in disbelief]
Ladyyomi suddenly screams: “She’s a bastard! An AI-using bastard! AI can fabricate lies, and since she likes using AI, she’s fake as a whole! Her values are corrupted! Don’t you get it?! I am the great, wise, human artist! Support me — I am justice, I am the truth, I am the eternal legend!”
Audience: [uproarious laughter, some slow clapping]
Postscript — Reality Edition: The real-life audience gave no reaction. No laughter, no boos, not even a gasp. Just the dull hum of people too deaf, too blind, or too comfortable to notice the circus on stage. A masterpiece of absurdity wasted on an empty room.
Post by @vicecommanderhijikata · 4 images
1.Trigger Conditions
External content unfavorable to ladyyomi appears (such as your fake interview).
The content is highly satirical/highly viral, easily influencing the impression of bystanders.
2.Action Process
Step 1: Key Person Monitoring
Monitoring signals: Seeing negative posts about oneself or companions for the first time (stakeout monitoring, keyword alerts).
Executors: onino / ladyyomi themselves.
Goal: Ensure that negative content does not gain a “no rebuttal” time window in the public opinion arena.
Step 2: Immediate firepower output
Form of expression:
Immediately post a long rebuttal under the original post/quoted post.
Use strong insulting language (“stalking piece of shit,” “slimy little bastard”).
Apply legal terms like “libel” to create a sense of intimidation.
Purpose: emotional bombardment → divert audience attention → shift focus to whether the poster is “defaming/stalking” rather than the original post’s satirical content.
Step 3: stacking emotional/moral cards
Introducing ladyyomi’s existing victim narrative (“She is sick,” “Attacking vulnerable groups”).
Portraying the attacker as a villain targeting “vulnerable groups,” thereby giving onlookers a “moral stance” to choose.
Step 4: Peripheral follow-up
Time window: 1 to 3 days.
Method: When retelling the event on other platforms, directly quote onino’s statement to create a secondary dissemination label.
Effect: Causes the original post’s content to be overshadowed by the “stigmatizing label” in subsequent dissemination.
3.Division of roles
4.Strategic Significance
Ensure ladyyomi controls the first wave of public opinion after the incident breaks out.
Prevent the opponent’s narrative from gaining unchallenged dissemination time on the platform.
Weaken the audience’s interest in reading and understanding the original post content through emotional and stigmatizing labels.
Step 1 → Negative content appears, threatening Ladyyomi’s narrative. Step 2 → Core monitoring (Ladyyomi / Onino) spots it instantly. Step 3 → Onino launches immediate attack, mixing emotional insults with “legal” buzzwords. Step 4 → Moral card is played via victim narrative to claim the high ground. Step 5 → Outer circle supporters amplify by repeating and spreading the labels. Step 6 → Narrative solidifies before the original post gains traction.
Weaponizing Structural Inequality to Harass — and Platforms Let It Happen